On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 22:29 +0100, Abe Timmerman wrote:
> App::Prove can only do a simple version of rules (that ends up running the
> tests all wrong).
>
> On the other hand, prove has all the logic we need to get the job done.
>
> Is there a way, without redoing all the work in App::Prove to ge
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 12:44 -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
> The prove -v is lying to me about what the TAP was. That violates
> what was my intent in adding -v originally. I don't want to have to
> run the program manually to get the raw TAP.
Already fixed in SVN.
> [snip]The test number is 0,
Heya,
Attached are a number of small patches for TAP::Harness and associated
packages. I'm sending this here, because it's not clear from the
documentation where bugs and patches should be sent. The Test::Harness
queue cc's all of p5p, so I erred away from using that.
First, app-prove-rules.pa
