tp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2008/09/msg2291738.html
BinGOs on #p5p posted the following url:
http://stats.cpantesters.org/cpanmail.html
If you go to it and enter 2291738 then you should also see the email address.
Kind regards,
Bram
what I should be doing?
People will always complain. It's a lot easier to complain that the
author isn't doing their 'job' 'correctly' then helping the author out
by sending patches.
What you shouldn't forget is you are hearing much less from the many
many users that are using your software and are very grateful for and
happy with it.
Kind regards,
Bram
Quoting nadim khemir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Monday 12 May 2008 16.23.46 Bram wrote:
Then what happens if it starts returning 4?
Then the test script will report a FAIL, and users will/might start
ignoring failures.
Which is a bad thing (IMHO).
The todo test indicates that something d
Quoting Smylers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Bram writes:
At the moment foo() returns 3.
Time passes and code changes.
Now there are 3 options:
foo() returns 1, this will result in 'unexpected todo test passed'
being outputted;
foo() returns 3, no special output is produced;
foo
$WAS = 3;
my $s1 = foo();
is($s1, "1");
}
I initially suggested another syntax but I'm now in favor of David's
suggestion.
(Obviously this would also be applied to isn't, like, unlike, )
Comments? Ideas?
Would a patch that adds this behavior be considered?
Kind regards,
Bram
