On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:03:59PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Dave Mitchell wrote:
So unless some other problem comes up, then 0.91 should match both those
goals and everyone's happy.
0.92 is on its way to CPAN with Craig's fixes.
http://github.com/schwern/test-more/tree/v0.92
Its
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:03:59PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Dave Mitchell wrote:
So unless some other problem comes up, then 0.91 should match both those
goals and everyone's happy.
0.92 is on its way to CPAN with Craig's fixes.
http://github.com/schwern/test-more/tree/v0.92
OK
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 11:11:53AM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
We're back in the same place as before. Its just a couple of little test
fixes. You can apply them or I can make another release.
Since its easy enough to make a release now days I'll just do it. But I feel
like we're
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 07:23:31PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Craig A. Berry wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Michael G Schwernschw...@pobox.com wrote:
This is a quick release to sync with perl so 5.10.1 can release with a
stable
version number. It does NOT include the
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 11:48:15AM +0200, demerphq wrote:
On 9/20/07, flw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C:\cat ttt.pl
use strict;
use warnings;
{
my $x = 'A';
sub f { sub { $x++ } }
sub g { sub { $x++ } if $x }
}
my $F=f();
my $G=g();
print $F-(),$G-(),, for
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 03:46:37PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
The repo browser unfortunately only goes back 50 revisions.
It can display *any* 50 revisions; for example,
http://public.activestate.com/cgi-bin/perlbrowse/c/1
shows you changes 9951 - 1. Admittedly it could do
