=head1 NAME
Perl Core Smoke Test Suite
=head1 DESCRIPTION
The perl core smoke test suite is a set of simple scripts that try to
run the perl core tests on as many configurations as possible and combine
that into a easy to parse report.
The perl source tree is refreshed using rsync to the lates
On Mon 05 Nov 2001 15:50, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > (1) How about looking for my snapshot announcements in p5p
> > > (or "patchlevel.h" updates in perl5-changes) and launching smokes
> > > from them, not from some arbitrary points in time?
> > >
> > > (2) Add a (cronjob?)
On Sat 27 Oct 2001 23:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Foley) wrote:
> Michael G Schwern wrote:
> >
> > At YAPC::Europe, there was some talk over dinner about the perlbug
> > email interface and making it a little easier to close bugs.
> > Basically write up some mutt/elm/your-favorite-mailer-here
On Thu 04 Oct 2001 23:25, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I didn't know it was NCR UNIX. Wow. I've never even heard of that. I
> > thought we were up against something fairly sane.
>
> I've heard of it. I believe it's a fairly sto
On Wed 03 Oct 2001 18:17, Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 03-Oct-01 H.Merijn Brand tried to scribble about:
> > On Tue 02 Oct 2001 22:39, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 04:34:34PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> >> > Running tests for ExtUtils:
On Tue 02 Oct 2001 22:39, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 04:34:34PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > Running tests for ExtUtils::MakeMaker
> > t/ExtUtilsok
> > All tests successful.
>
On Sat 22 Sep 2001 00:50, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, that's a big job to get right and we'll do it later. Right
> now, stick to the cleanups and adding coverage. It also wouldn't hurt
> to start going through old open perlbug entries.
A lead to find bugs that are al
vz.pl changed to use mail if mailx not found in PATH
--- Original Message ---
From:PAUSE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "H. Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Tue, 18 Sep 2001 15:12:25 +0200
Subject: CPA
On Thu 13 Sep 2001 06:57, Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Wheeler writes:
> > This diff adds jsr_ic and ret to the interpreter. I don't know if my
> > way of returning is legal, and I know there's probably issues with 64
> > bit machines, but it works...and that's the import
From: PAUSE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "H. Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:03:23 +0200
Subject: CPAN Upload: H/HM/HMBRAND/Test-Smoke-1.07.tgz
The URL
http://home.hccnet.nl/h.m.brand/Test-Smoke-1.07.tgz
has e
On Fri 13 Jul 2001 16:31, "H.Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He's promised to drop 5.7.2 in place just before he leaves, and have a rapid
> cycle of 5.8.0 RC's when he returns.
It seemed I was just in time, and Jarkko kept promise ...
--- Original Message -
On Fri 13 Jul 2001 16:31, "H.Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's all surprise Jarkko when he returns from his vacation ...
Guys on perl-qa, I forgot to set the follow-up, please reply to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (subscribe if you have not done
already)
--
H.Merijn Bra
Let's all surprise Jarkko when he returns from his vacation ...
He's promised to drop 5.7.2 in place just before he leaves, and have a rapid
cycle of 5.8.0 RC's when he returns.
Let's be ready for him to test those!
If you have any CPU cycles left, and a little time to set things up, co
On Wed 11 Jul 2001 00:58, "Justin Jeffs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perl testing,
>
>
> I am writing to find out if you have any need of Perl testers. I am a QA
> Engineer and would love to help with Perl 6. Please let me know if you
> would like any help with this process.
If you've got an
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:49:04 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> > As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name.
>
> Likewise. What's wrong with builders?
Same here. Testers?
--
H.Merijn Brand
15 matches
Mail list logo