On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:34, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> This was suggested previously in 2008
>
> http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-06/msg00912.html
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 04:59:57PM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>> Having a parallel and featureful testing system is
Jerry D. Hedden wrote:
> If the functionality in test.pl (that does not currently
> exist in other module) could be duplicated elsewhere using a
> Test::Builder-based module, would there be a reason then to
> maintain test.pl? Would it be better then to eliminate
> test.pl enti
Jerry D. Hedden wrote:
> From what I can tell, there are well over a dozen
> dual-lived modules that incorporate test.pl into their
> distributions. Rather than continuing this trend, I would
> like to propose turning it into a module and dual-lifing
> it to CPAN.
Nicholas Clark w
Michael G Schwern wrote:
> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/src/Test-Simple-0.71.tar.gz
BTW, when to you plan to submit a patch for this against blead?
Michael G Schwern wrote:
> 0.71 Thu Sep 13 20:42:36 PDT 2007
> Bug fixes
> - Fixed a problem with BEGIN { use_ok } silently failing when there's no
> plan set. [rt.cpan.org 28345] Thanks Adriano Ferreira and Yitzchak.
Uh, oh! This fix causes test failures with DBI and
Math::Rando
name}{$osvers}{$archname}{$tester}).
Otherwise,
$unique{$version}{$perl}{$osname}{$osvers}{$archname}{$tester} is set
to the report ID (arbitrary).
- The report order is reversed (i.e., lowest ID to highest) by changing
"push @reports, $report" to "unshift @reports, $report"
> Subject: Re: FAIL threads-1.09 MSWin32-x86-multi-thread 4.0
> From: Max Maischein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, March 15, 2006 4:43 pm
> To: "Jerry D. Hedden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Jerry D. Hedden wrote:
> > Would you mind running this again?
Adam Kennedy wrote:
> Part of the problem comes in defining "bogus".
This is a red herring. Consider the original proposal:
If a tester sends in a 'updated' report (matching all the appropriate
criteria), then the update should overwrite/mask the original.
There is no need to define the criteri
Today, I filed a bug report against CPANPLUS because it
sometimes fails to detect missing prerequisites, resulting
in bogus FAIL reports being generated against modules:
http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=18144
Here are two examples of such failures:
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl
