On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Chad Granum wrote:
>
> RJBS and I have spoken, and feel it is time to set a release date for
> Test2/Test-Builder. We have agreed that doing it at the QAH in Rugby is a
> good time. The plan is to release Test2 and the new Test::Builder as stable
> either at the e
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 11:57 PM, bulk88 wrote:
> Since Test::Stream::Context's core design uses weaken() everywhere, that
> means new Test::Simple always requires XS building (for Scalar::Util),
> which means it will never run on miniperl, and hence, new Test::Simple will
> never be in Perl core
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> In accordance with the terms of my grant from TPF this is the final report
> for
> my work on improving Devel::Cover.
>
> Since the last report I have released versions 1.16 and 1.17.
>
> The stable release of perl 5.20.1 along with developme
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Patrick Michael Niedzielski <
patrickniedziel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm sending this email to request some comments on a C++11 library I've
> written based on Test::More. I hope this is on topic for this mailing
> list. If there are better places for
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Torbjørn Lindahl <
torbjorn.lind...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It seems t/lib is a common place to put modules used to support testing,
> how about having Test::More push that path to @INC if -d 't/lib' ? It would
> save me one , possibly two annoying lines of code in e
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
> I’m looking at using TAP::Harness to process our test suite. Up to now
> we’ve been using some home grown code that IMHO is a heroic attempt to
> re-implement TAP::Harness.
>
> It seems to do everything we need with one exception. We have rul
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Jan Seidel wrote:
> > Have you contacted the author? It doesn't look to me like you filed a
> bug report. Odds are this is something that could easily be fixed.
> > Leon
>
> Thanks for the recommendation, I opened a bug. I initially skipped this as
> I saw anothe
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Jan Seidel wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’m using the Test::ParallelSubtest module to run multiple tests in
> parallel. However, a change in Test::Builder now broke this module. Every
> bg_subtest block fails with an error like the following:
>
>
>
> not ok 1 - parse ch
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> I read that post and have one question: can I easily create several
> specialised
> plugins and have them all apply their modified behaviours to the relevant
> part
> of TAP::Harness? Seems like I can only set up a single subclass of the
> rel
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) <
philippe.bru...@free.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am very pleased to announce that the Perl QA Hackathon 2014 will be held
> in Lyon, France, in the Booking.com offices (http://goo.gl/maps/mXo15),
> from Friday March 14 to Sunday March 16, 201
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:49 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:03:59PM -0400, Ricardo Signes wrote:
>
> > I am sending this as a heads-up because sometimes really twitchy things
> are
> > really twichy about version numbers, and anything getting really twitchy
> about
> > Tes
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
> * Leon Timmermans [2013-09-17T11:26:40]
> > Just as I expected, "make it a wiki" means it gets warnocked again.
> >
> > Can we please make a decision, or if we must first come to an agreement
> on
> &g
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
> It looks like Module::Build already has use_tap_harness. So what's
> suggested
> is a patch to ExtUtils::MM_Any to switch from Test::Harness to
> TAP::Harness...?
>
Or both just setting $Test::Harness::switches = ''…
Leon
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Mark Stosberg wrote:
> I think a pro/con list is a reasonable request. I've read all the
> messages myself, am a regular user of Perl's testing tools, and the
> benefits and drawbacks are not clear to me either.
>
> An attempting-to-be-neutral summary would be ver
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Ovid wrote:
> I'm winding up with astonishingly little bandwidth due to launching our
> company, so I was hoping to see a strong consensus from the users. I would
> also love to see examples of where the change or lack thereof is causing an
> issue. I am SWAMPED w
Hi Tracy,
Given your industry, I can readily imagine you need that paperwork. I
don't think such a formal document exists, but I do believe perl's QA
routine is sufficiently robust that it would pass through that.
I suspect we'd know the answers, but not the questions in this matter.
We don't kno
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Ovid wrote:
> What toolchain software is being impacted by this and how hard would it be to
> make the switch?
AFAIK only ExtUtils::MakeMaker and Module::Build use it. The latter
can already use TAP::Harness, but there are some details we'd might
want to fix first
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
>
> I just submitted:
>
> https://github.com/Perl-Toolchain-Gang/Test-Harness/pull/16
>
> ...to document two undocumented changes. First, the removal of "turn on -w by
> default with no easy way to turn it off" and secondly the reversion of
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:39 PM, brian d foy wrote:
> In HARNESS_OPTIONS we can set -jN to note we want parallel tests
> running, but how can a particular module, which might be buried in the
> dependency chain, tell the harness it can't do that?
>
> It seems to me that by the time the tests are ru
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) <
philippe.bru...@free.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the main organizer of the next Perl QA Hackathon in Lyon (the venue
> is here: http://goo.gl/maps/mXo15), I would like to collect some feedback
> on the hackathon that we just came back from, in
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Andy Lester wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2013, at 5:08 AM, Mark Keating wrote:
>> The hackathon site is up, we are looking for sponsors and attendees.
>
>
> What made you put it up at a new domain, rather than qa.perl.org? I was
> surprised.
It seems we've been doing th
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On second thought, this has to be turned on explicitly for implementation
> reasons, so there's no backwards compat issue. "use Test::SharedFork" would
> simply turn on that feature in Test::Builder 1.5 providing a way to smoothly
> trans
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Ovid wrote:
> my @modules = qw(
> Test::Trap::Builder::TempFile
> Test::Trap::Builder::SystemSafe
> Test::Trap::Builder
> Test::Trap
> );
> push @modules => 'Test::Trap::Builder::PerlIO' if eval "use P
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Mike Doherty wrote:
> I don't see any discouragement in the documentation... and what's wrong
> with use_ok to begin with?
If it fails, the module may not be loaded, or partially loaded. In
such circumstances, testing the rest of the code can give very
confusing
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:26 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> *How* much longer? Does the upcoming MOP include syntax (class, method, role
> keywords) and stuff like roles? Will one be able to drop Mouse in favor of it?
I just asked doy. It will support all of that, but not on older
versions of perl
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> As a result of the discussions, I'm now reconsidering using Mouse in TB2. Its
> interesting, it's not for any of the reasons I thought, but for a distressing
> encapsulation breech built into Moose.
>
> The main concern is that the fact t
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
wrote:
> Seems the propagation is stuck in the intertubes:
>
> $ host 2011.qa-hackathon.org
> 2011.qa-hackathon.org is an alias for conferences.mongueurs.net.
> conferences.mongueurs.net is an alias for spectre.mongueurs.net.
> sp
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:30 PM, David Golden wrote:
> My bigger concern would be inclusion of Mouse in core as a dependency,
> since the direction of Perl seems to be to have fewer core modules,
> not more. I'd run that discussion by p5p/Ricardo before getting too
> tied to Mouse.
>
> Separately
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> I have written "Test::Builder2" more times than I can count.
>
> Wait, I can count them. It occurs at least 1280 times in the distribution.
> That's 18,000 keystrokes. 19,000 if you count shift. It gets a little
> tiresome. That's jus
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:44 PM, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> Test Summary Report
> ---
> t/20-uni-basic.t (Wstat: 139 Tests: 366 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero wait status: 139
> t/21-uni-regex.t (Wstat: 139 Tests: 18 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero wait status: 139
> Files=19, Tests=3658, 35 wallc
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
wrote:
> VENUE
> -
>
> We have two possible venues:
>
> ** Carrefour Numérique, Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie **
>
> Dates: Friday March 30 - Sunday April 1st, 2012
> Price: free
> Seats: 30
> Rooms: 1
> Location:
>
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 1:23 PM, James E Keenan wrote:
> In a github issue (https://github.com/schwern/test-more/issues/73), Michael
> Schwern argued that Test::Builder2 ought to be tested with a "completely
> unrelated test system. We have one, t/test.pl from the Perl core."
>
> I thought to mysel
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Buddy Burden wrote:
> Okay, this is addressing the "signal 9" ones. And I'm pursuing the
> "out of memory" ones. Does anyone have any ideas about the "no plan
> in output" ones? Remembering that this is using the latest versions
> of Test::More and Test::Harness?
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Buddy Burden wrote:
>> t/rand_time.t (Wstat: 9 Tests: 1764021 Failed: 0)
>> Non-zero wait status: 9
>
>> *** Signal 9
That one is obvious, it has been SIGKILLed. Probably the tester
thought the tests were hanging.
>> t/rand_time.t (Wstat: 139 Tests: 9
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
wrote:
> So we have started to look for venues and sponsors.
>
> Last year's host and main sponsor won't sponsor us this year, because they
> want to sponsor other Perl events (with more attendees). I will talk with
> the head of the Paris o
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:17 PM, David Golden wrote:
> Then, given one of those three ordered list of tarballs that satisfy
> all prereqs, it should be possibly to repeatably deploy an application
> with a known set of module versions, even as the "latest" on CPAN
> evolves.
That could get a bit
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Ovid wrote:
> 3. Possible cooperation from the CPAN, CPANPLUS, CPANM and other maintainers
> (see point 1).
>From the CPAN client's point of view, installing means executing
either «make install» or «./Build install». The actual installing is
done by ExtUtils::Ins
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Ricardo Signes
wrote:
> Thanks, but I'm afraid I wasn't clear about what I was looking for. I need to
> know how to get from the airport to the hotels or thereabouts. Using the
> address string you used in your Google maps link on the wiki, I can get a
> somewhat
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Ricardo Signes
wrote:
> The QA hackathon wiki suggests that directions to the hotels can be found at
> http://2011.qa-hackathon.org/qa2011/wiki?node=Accommodation but I do not see
> any, and Google Maps wants to give me directions to Kerkweg and can't find a
> Kerk
39 matches
Mail list logo
