From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 02:19:16PM +0100, Paul Marquess wrote:
> > Whilst I'm here, when I do get around to posting a beta on CPAN, I'd
> prefer
> > it doesn't get used in anger until it has bedded-in. If
From: Paul Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 03:00:14AM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 10:36:39AM +0100, Ben Evans wrote:
> > > I would say that this cascade effect is precisely why you *should*
> > > drop 5.004 compatability. There's no
From: David Landgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Konovalov, Vadim wrote:
> >>I've just been through the should-I-shouldn't-I-support-5.4 with my
> >>(painfully slow) rewrite of Compress::Zlib. In the end I
> >
> >
> > ...
> >
> > I always thought that Compress::Zlib is just a wrapper around zlib
From: Konovalov, Vadim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I've just been through the should-I-shouldn't-I-support-5.4 with my
> > (painfully slow) rewrite of Compress::Zlib. In the end I
>
> ...
>
> I always thought that Compress::Zlib is just a wrapper around zlib which
> in
> turn is C and develop
From: Michael G Schwern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 10:36:39AM +0100, Ben Evans wrote:
> > I would say that this cascade effect is precisely why you *should*
> > drop 5.004 compatability. There's no excuse other than "if it ain't
> broke,
> > don't fix it" for running such
From: Michael G Schwern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 10:39:50AM +0100, Paul Marquess wrote:
> > The subject says Compress::Zlib, but the body doesn't. Which is
> the typo?
>
> The subject. I'd thrown it into the list, I remember there hav
From: Michael G Schwern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Archive::Tar and Archive::Zip are very essential modules. You use
> them every time you run the CPAN shell. However, their implementation
> could use a little work and the authors could use a little help.
>
> In all cases the need better te
From: Michael G Schwern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 04:37:41PM +0100, Paul Marquess wrote:
> > From: Rafael Garcia-Suarez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > > Michael G Schwern listed:
> > > [...]
> > > > warnings::register
From: Rafael Garcia-Suarez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Michael G Schwern listed:
> [...]
> > warnings::register (almost no docs)
Hmm, would a "see L and L." do?
> There are no tests for warnings.pm either.
>
> Note that there are two distinct points here :
>
> 1. test the warnings issued by th
