On Jan 12, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Adam Leventhal wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:12:57PM -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
My main beef with stack helpers is that they have to be executed
inside the kernel and are subject to the usual DTrace restrictions.
I would like to see a possibility of
On Jan 11, 2008, at 6:26 PM, Eric Schrock wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 06:23:14PM -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
I guess we are talking about two different kinds of generality
here.
What I have in mind is the generality that would allow DTrace to be
able to offload some of the
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 01:30 +, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:39:25PM -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> > > Due to the lack of ustack helper, I am hoping to add a stack probe
> >
> > Two things: first of all DTrace could really benefit from a
&g
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 17:32 -0800, Bryan Cantrill wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:39:25PM -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 11:21 +1100, Sven Dowideit wrote:
> > > excellent stuff Andy!
> > >
> > > To start with the obvious :)
&g
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 11:21 +1100, Sven Dowideit wrote:
> excellent stuff Andy!
>
> To start with the obvious :)
>
> Due to the lack of ustack helper, I am hoping to add a stack probe
Two things: first of all DTrace could really benefit from a
general purpose mechanism of hooking up custom sta
