Re: Test names vs. test comments

2004-12-02 Thread publiustemp-perlqa3
--- Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a modest proposal. > Stop calling the 2nd parm to ok() the "name". It's really a comment. > > ok( $is_happy, "Make sure the doodad is wingoed" ); Hmm ... I like this idea, though I confess that I don't like that the comment is optional. Wh

Re: [RFC] adding skip option directly to plan()

2004-11-30 Thread publiustemp-perlqa3
--- Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would just ask that it be done as > >plan tests => $n, @list_of_conditions_to_be_met > > I would hate to see the 3rd+ parms turn into a meta-language of stuff > like > >plan tests => 14, needs => "Apache::Wango 1.14"; > > Rather, just make