Moin,
On Thursday 16 March 2006 03:49, chromatic wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 18:43, Geoffrey Young wrote:
I was suggesting the functionality be added to Test::More as
compile_ok(), rather than runperl() in some separate CPAN module, as
it seems to closely parallel use_ok() for
I just found http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Strict,
which was written by one of my co-workers. Among
other cool things, it has a Csyntax_ok function
which does the same thing. It still uses backticks
and redirection which may not be too portable, but it
will suit my needs. Still, a
Putting aside the argument that most logic should be
in libraries and not scripts, what is the best
practice for writing test cases to verify that your
Perl scripts compile? My quick and dirty solution is
something like:
use Test::More tests = 1;
chomp (my $output = `perl -c $script 21`);
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 12:25, Jeffrey Thalhammer wrote:
I'm sure I could clean this up by opening a pipe
instead of using backticks and output redirection.
But even that doesn't smell very good. I've looked
around on CPAN, but I have not yet found a Test::
module that seems appropriate.
chromatic wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 12:25, Jeffrey Thalhammer wrote:
I'm sure I could clean this up by opening a pipe
instead of using backticks and output redirection.
But even that doesn't smell very good. I've looked
around on CPAN, but I have not yet found a Test::
module that
Moin,
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 21:29, chromatic wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 12:25, Jeffrey Thalhammer wrote:
I'm sure I could clean this up by opening a pipe
instead of using backticks and output redirection.
But even that doesn't smell very good. I've looked
around on CPAN, but
On Mar 15, 2006, at 2:47 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
chromatic wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 12:25, Jeffrey Thalhammer wrote:
I'm sure I could clean this up by opening a pipe
instead of using backticks and output redirection.
But even that doesn't smell very good. I've looked
around on
http://search.cpan.org/src/ADAMK/ThreatNet-Bot-AmmoBot-0.10/t/01_compile.t
That function should probably be changed to use FindBin instead of
updir() calls.
Actually, by modern standards I'd consider that a pretty half-assed.
Mostly for the fact it's a highly unix usage.
If it was doing
I've long intended to take t/test.pl from the Perl core distribution
and wrap
up at least its runperl() in a Test:: module. Perhaps that would
work for
you?
compile_ok() ?
--Geoff
It is unclear from Geoff's message above whether he is asserting that
function exists, or if he is
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 18:43, Geoffrey Young wrote:
I was suggesting the functionality be added to Test::More as compile_ok(),
rather than runperl() in some separate CPAN module, as it seems to closely
parallel use_ok() for modules and would be rather useful on a larger scale.
That would
Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was suggesting the functionality be added to Test::More as compile_ok(),
rather than runperl() in some separate CPAN module, as it seems to closely
parallel use_ok() for modules and would be rather useful on a larger scale.
I agree, a well
11 matches
Mail list logo
