In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Adam
Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody would care about dependencies if they never failed (except for
the issue of installation time).
I have a couple of clients that are very skittish about outside
dependencies in general. They have to get thrid-party
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tels
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure what stupid consists, but my system wouldn't have
problems
handling 512 MB of memory.
I'd prefer that you not decide that my system needs 512Mb to use this,
even if you can handle that on your side.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tels
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My real-grand-plan was always to have a CPANDB module that does exactly the
following:
I think the latest version of my cpan(1) script does everything you
show, although it doesn't use a local database. It would be nice to
have all
* Tels [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-14 02:40]:
announced to early - now everybody tells me how I have to
implement it and why my way wont work
You were saying Adam’s way is inferior to your way. I disagreed.
That’s about the size of it.
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/
Plus, I planned to
use YAML because it creates a _much_ less heavy overhead and dependency
chain. Using SQLite or similiar is what really creates the problems
with CPANTS - you cant just access the raw database without the
front-end.
Erm, I'm not sure I get you here. The main problem with all
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Tels [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-14 02:40]:
announced to early - now everybody tells me how I have to
implement it and why my way wont work
You were saying Adam’s way is inferior to your way. I disagreed.
That’s about the size of it.
I agree my way is inferior,
Tels wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Moin,
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 03:13, David Golden wrote:
Tels wrote:
My idea was to build _only_ the database, and do it right, simple and
easy to use and then get everyone else to just use the DB instead of
fiddling with their own.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Moin,
On Thursday 13 July 2006 08:26, Adam Kennedy wrote:
Tels wrote:
The DB backend shouldn't matter at all, it should be transparent and be
switchable without any noticable change at the front.
Yep, right with you. Hence DBIx::Class.
*sigh*
* Tels [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-12 19:00]:
Using SQLite or similiar is what really creates the problems
with CPANTS - you cant just access the raw database without the
front-end.
All you need is one binary from www.sqlite.org – I don’t follow
why this is a problem. And I certainly prefer
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Tels [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-12 19:00]:
Using SQLite or similiar is what really creates the problems
with CPANTS - you cant just access the raw database without the
front-end.
All you need is one binary from www.sqlite.org – I don’t follow
why this is a problem.
* Michael Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-13 19:50]:
And if you use DBD::SQLite you don't even need that. I has
everything you'd need.
Actually that’s more of a hassle. If you install DBI::Shell you
get close, but having to specify a DSN is still a hassle. With
the SQLite binary you just say
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Moin,
On Thursday 13 July 2006 19:40, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Tels [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-12 19:00]:
Using SQLite or similiar is what really creates the problems
with CPANTS - you cant just access the raw database without the
front-end.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Heya Tim,
afte seeing the recent discussion about CPANDB and CPAN::Index, I don't
think I want to work on that project anymore for two reasons:
* announced to early - now everybody tells me how I have to implement it and
why my way wont work
*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Moin,
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 03:13, David Golden wrote:
Tels wrote:
My idea was to build _only_ the database, and do it right, simple and
easy to use and then get everyone else to just use the DB instead of
fiddling with their own. (simple
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 03:03:14AM +0200, Tels wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Moin Tim,
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 18:34, Tim Bunce wrote:
I needed some code to trawl through a directory tree parsing perl
modules and scripts to determine their dependencies.
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Moin Tim,
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 18:34, Tim Bunce wrote:
I needed some code to trawl through a directory tree parsing perl
modules and scripts to determine their dependencies.
The closest existing CPAN code was Module::Dependency but it fell
Tels wrote:
My idea was to build _only_ the database, and do it right, simple and easy
to use and then get everyone else to just use the DB instead of fiddling
with their own. (simple by having the database being superior to every
other hack thats in existance now :-)
I even got so far as to
17 matches
Mail list logo
