Maybe somebody would like to, ya know, provide a patch for an open ticket or
something?
http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=22767
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
> I offer this word of warning. If you have too many tests, or many
> longly-named tests, win32 will in all likelyhood barf with a command
> line too long error.
>
> I had this problem in Handel (too many tests..it's a good problem to
> have really), and even after updati
On 2/8/07, Christopher H. Laco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nik Clayton wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:26:01AM +, Nik Clayton wrote:
>>
>>> [ I vaguely recall a discussion about this, but my search-fu is weak,
>>> and I can't find it ]
>>>
>>> Is there a standard way
* Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-08T19:17:39]
>
> Yep, although M::I has some capacity to add a but of extra magic if you
> could come up with a workaround (like having File::Find locate them all
> and provide a complete list of TESTS).
I do this in http://search.cpan.org/src/RJBS/Ru
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Nik Clayton wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:26:01AM +, Nik Clayton wrote:
[ I vaguely recall a discussion about this, but my search-fu is weak,
and I can't find it ]
Is there a standard way/idiom to get ExtUtils::MakeMaker to support
tests
Although Andy says that MakeMaker can't do it, MakeMaker has a
built-in
extension mechanism with the MY::* namespace to override parts of
itself.
True enough. I have standard extensions of MY::postamble in all my
Makefile.PLs so that I have targets for "tags" and "critic".
sub MY::posta
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nik
Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a standard way/idiom to get ExtUtils::MakeMaker to support tests in
> subdirectories of t/?
I don't know of a standard idiom, but I created Test::Manifest so I
didn't have to live with MakeMaker's method of gettin
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy
Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2007, at 1:26 AM, Nik Clayton wrote:
>
> > [ I vaguely recall a discussion about this, but my search-fu is
> > weak, and I can't find it ]
> >
> > Is there a standard way/idiom to get ExtUtils::MakeMaker to suppo
On Feb 8, 2007, at 1:26 AM, Nik Clayton wrote:
[ I vaguely recall a discussion about this, but my search-fu is
weak, and I can't find it ]
Is there a standard way/idiom to get ExtUtils::MakeMaker to support
tests in subdirectories of t/?
I've got a bunch of tests, and rather than client-
On Feb 8, 2007, at 1:26 AM, Nik Clayton wrote:
[ I vaguely recall a discussion about this, but my search-fu is
weak, and I can't find it ]
Is there a standard way/idiom to get ExtUtils::MakeMaker to support
tests in subdirectories of t/?
I've got a bunch of tests, and rather than client-
Nik Clayton wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:26:01AM +, Nik Clayton wrote:
>>
>>> [ I vaguely recall a discussion about this, but my search-fu is weak,
>>> and I can't find it ]
>>>
>>> Is there a standard way/idiom to get ExtUtils::MakeMaker to support
>>> tests in su
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:26:01AM +, Nik Clayton wrote:
[ I vaguely recall a discussion about this, but my search-fu is weak, and I
can't find it ]
Is there a standard way/idiom to get ExtUtils::MakeMaker to support tests
in subdirectories of t/?
I've got a bunch o
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:26:01AM +, Nik Clayton wrote:
> [ I vaguely recall a discussion about this, but my search-fu is weak, and I
> can't find it ]
>
> Is there a standard way/idiom to get ExtUtils::MakeMaker to support tests
> in subdirectories of t/?
>
> I've got a bunch of tests, a
[ I vaguely recall a discussion about this, but my search-fu is weak, and I
can't find it ]
Is there a standard way/idiom to get ExtUtils::MakeMaker to support tests in
subdirectories of t/?
I've got a bunch of tests, and rather than client-ls.t, client-add.t,
client-commit.t, etc, I'd like
14 matches
Mail list logo
