Re: Have/Want

2008-08-11 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
> > On Aug 6, 2008, at 20:12, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > >So I encourage folks to use "have" and "want" in the future. I'll > > >be using them in Test::Builder2. Test.php updated and released. -- rjbs

Re: Have/Want

2008-08-09 Thread chromatic
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 20:12:43 Michael G Schwern wrote: > So I encourage folks to use "have" and "want" in the future.  I'll be using > them in Test::Builder2. Parrot port updated in r30154 as well. -- c

Re: Have/Want

2008-08-07 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
* "David E. Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-07T00:31:27] > On Aug 6, 2008, at 20:12, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > >So I encourage folks to use "have" and "want" in the future. I'll > >be using them in Test::Builder2. > > Good call. Change committed to pgtap and Test.Builder. and PyTAP,

Re: Have/Want

2008-08-06 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Aug 6, 2008, at 20:12, Michael G Schwern wrote: So I encourage folks to use "have" and "want" in the future. I'll be using them in Test::Builder2. Good call. Change committed to pgtap and Test.Builder. Thanks, David

Have/Want

2008-08-06 Thread Michael G Schwern
I don't remember if this escaped the Oslo Hackathon. For a long time people have been complaining about "Got" as in "Got vs Expected" (for, imho, fussy grammar reasons). Also "expected" is long and has to be carefully lined up with "got". During the Oslo Hackathon we knocked this around some