Re: Ignoring Non-Failures

2008-09-03 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, David E. Wheeler wrote: http://cpantesters.perl.org/author/DWHEELER.rss This makes it easy for me to sift through things. The only thing that would make it better is if I could get it to display only FAILs. To whom should a feature request be sent (I thought I sent a patch

Re: Ignoring Non-Failures

2008-09-03 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Sep 3, 2008, at 11:22, Ricardo SIGNES wrote: * "David E. Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-03T13:27:08] http://cpantesters.perl.org/author/DWHEELER.rss Now that there's a new maintainer, I should send another email... Say what? Sorry, I don't follow you here. Is there a new maintain

Re: Ignoring Non-Failures

2008-09-03 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
* "David E. Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-03T13:27:08] > http://cpantesters.perl.org/author/DWHEELER.rss Now that there's a new maintainer, I should send another email... this file, for me is so large (6,680,062 bytes) that my RSS reader times out trying to retrieve it. Ugh. -- rjbs

Ignoring Non-Failures

2008-09-03 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Sep 2, 2008, at 13:23, chromatic wrote: I already know that my distributions don't work if you don't install the dependencies, or if you use an unsupported version of Perl. You don't have to waste anyone's time testing that. What I don't know is if my distributions work on different ope