--- Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the mean time if you don't mind poking a private method you can
> do:
>
> INIT { Test::Class->runtests( Test::Class->_test_classes, +1 ) }
>
> If you do mind you could always copy'n'paste the code out into your
> subclass and rename appropriate
On 8 Mar 2007, at 11:17, Ovid wrote:
[snip]
How do I run an individual test class which inherits from
"My::Test::Class" and have the INIT block in "My::Test::Class"
dynamically determine which test class name to put there? That's
what's stumping me.
[snip]
Damn. I knew that asymmetric treatme
--- Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8 Mar 2007, at 10:44, Ovid wrote:
> [snip]
> > I cannot easily use 'Test::NoWarnings' because that adds an extra
> > test,
> > thus forcing me to use 'no_plan' with one of my tests. Is there
> some
> > other way around this?
> [snip]
>
> Do
On 8 Mar 2007, at 10:44, Ovid wrote:
[snip]
I cannot easily use 'Test::NoWarnings' because that adds an extra
test,
thus forcing me to use 'no_plan' with one of my tests. Is there some
other way around this?
[snip]
Do something like:
INIT { Test::Class->runtests( 'Foo', +1 ) }
Also, not
So here's a minimal test class program (v0.24):
package Foo;
use Test::More;
use Test::NoWarnings;
use base 'Test::Class';
INIT { Test::Class->runtests }
sub startup : Tests(startup => 1) { ok 1 }
sub setup : Tests(setup => 1){ ok 1 }
sub some_test : T
