On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:55:47PM +0100, Tels wrote:
> > Ok, Test::Legacy it is. Now I have to figure out if I want to reimplement
> > Test.pm from scratch or try and wedge a TB object into the existing code.
> > Sean's added a lot of code since last I looked.
>
> I really have to ask :o)
>
> *
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Tuesday 30 November 2004 23:19, Andy Lester wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:55:47PM +0100, Tels ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > - From my POV it seems the energy and time to rewrite Test.pm (including
> > fixing the intermidiate breakage) could be
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:55:47PM +0100, Tels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> - From my POV it seems the energy and time to rewrite Test.pm (including
> fixing
> the intermidiate breakage) could be spent for other more worthwhile projects.
Like which ones? What else is lacking?
Foolishly asking,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Tuesday 30 November 2004 22:10, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:27:55AM -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 07:48:00AM -0600, Steve Peters
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > I like Test::Compat. Test::Legacy makes
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:27:55AM -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 07:48:00AM -0600, Steve Peters ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > I like Test::Compat. Test::Legacy makes me think more of the current
> > Test.pm
> > rather than of a new module.
>
> But it's actually going t
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 07:48:00AM -0600, Steve Peters ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I like Test::Compat. Test::Legacy makes me think more of the current Test.pm
> rather than of a new module.
But it's actually going to be Test.pm, not a new module. Just a new
back-end.
--
Andy Lester => [EMA
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:46:24AM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> I'm writing a module to emulate the functionality of Test.pm but with
> a Test::Builder backend so you can use TB-based modules with older tests.
>
> I'm trying to come up with a name. The current working title is Test::Legacy
Michael G Schwern wrote in perl.qa :
> I'm writing a module to emulate the functionality of Test.pm but with
> a Test::Builder backend so you can use TB-based modules with older tests.
>
> I'm trying to come up with a name. The current working title is Test::Legacy.
I like it.
> Test::Compat a
I'm writing a module to emulate the functionality of Test.pm but with
a Test::Builder backend so you can use TB-based modules with older tests.
I'm trying to come up with a name. The current working title is Test::Legacy.
Test::Compat and Test::Classic have also been suggested.
Thoughts?
--
