Michael G Schwern writes:
> "perl-benchmarks" good idea. Who's chairing? (not me, not now anyway)
I *strongly* recommend giving it a deadline and a specific goal. Also,
the mailing list name would be perl6-qa-benchmarks.
Nat
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 09:18:24AM -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
> Is it worth opening a new list, "perl6-benchmarks"? I have a
> feeling that the traffic flow could be fairly high, at least for a while.
"perl-benchmarks" good idea. Who's chairing? (not me, not now anyway)
--
Michael G Sch
Michael G Schwern sent the following bits through the ether:
> The things we bench need not be simple low level bits.
AFAIK benchmarking in general hasn't really been done in Perl, apart
from the recent slew of 'sort' benchmarks. I think that proper
benchmarks give us a great deal of information
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 06:56:36PM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> I'd rather see someone write a program that involves file reading
> and writing, regular expression manipulation, some string tweaking
> (length, concatenation, etc), and some object method calls. That
> covers the spectrum of T
