- Original Message
> From: Michael G Schwern
>
> > The latest developer release of Test::More allows subtests. Subtests are
> > great
> > in that they solve a lot of problems in advanced Perl testing, but they have
> > required a change in Test::Builder.
>
> Whoa whoa whoa! While its
Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
> * Ovid [2009-06-30T10:21:24]
>> The latest developer release of Test::More allows subtests. Subtests are
>> great in that they solve a lot of problems in advanced Perl testing, but they
>> have required a change in Test::Builder. Previously you could do stuff like
>> this:
Ovid wrote:
> (Helps if I send this from a subscribed address):
>
> From http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/39193
>
> The latest developer release of Test::More allows subtests. Subtests are great
> in that they solve a lot of problems in advanced Perl testing, but they have
> required a change in
- Original Message
> From: Ricardo SIGNES
>
> I updated my Test:: libraries to Test::Builder->new in their test routines,
> instead, as that's what I thought the original wisdom was. Is that still
> okay? (I did not add subtest-specific tests.)
>
> That is, I turned:
>
> my $TEST
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:01 AM, David Golden wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Ovid wrote:
>> my $BUILDER = Test::Builder->new;
>
> I'm running visitcpan to generate a list of offenders now. Results posted
> soon.
And here we go: http://echo.dagolden.com/~xdg/2009-06-30-test-builde
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Ovid wrote:
> my $BUILDER = Test::Builder->new;
I'm running visitcpan to generate a list of offenders now. Results posted soon.
-- David
* Ovid [2009-06-30T10:21:24]
> The latest developer release of Test::More allows subtests. Subtests are
> great in that they solve a lot of problems in advanced Perl testing, but they
> have required a change in Test::Builder. Previously you could do stuff like
> this:
I updated my Test:: librar
