On Sep 17, 2008, at 17:51, Michael G Schwern wrote:
I think that you can add TAP columns for JavaScript and PHP, too, no?
Yeah, and so can you. :P
Someone beat me to it for PHP, but I added a TAP column for
JavaScript, along with a link to Test.Simple.
Now if only we could get OpenJSAN a
# from Michael G Schwern
# on Wednesday 17 September 2008 17:51:
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unit_testing_frameworks#Perl
>>
>> I think that you can add TAP columns for JavaScript and PHP, too,
>> no?
>
>Yeah, and so can you. :P
This mail contains unsubstantiated or potentially subje
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Sep 17, 2008, at 13:24, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
>> FWIW I added a TAP column to the Perl section on Wikipedia's list of unit
>> testing frameworks. If every testing framework has to sound off on
>> xUnit, why
>> not TAP?
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unit
On Sep 17, 2008, at 13:24, Michael G Schwern wrote:
FWIW I added a TAP column to the Perl section on Wikipedia's list of
unit
testing frameworks. If every testing framework has to sound off on
xUnit, why
not TAP?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unit_testing_frameworks#Perl
I think th
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
>> My stock thinking is that because it follows the xUnit pattern that's
>> most familiar to most non-Perl programmers. It's the first thing
>> they stumble on that looks like what they're used to. So that's what
>> they go with.
>
> Even if they had no prior language experie
# from Michael G Schwern
# on Tuesday 16 September 2008 18:57:
>Ovid wrote:
>> PerlUnit is dead. Lots of people are recommending PerlUnit. What
>> have I missed?
>>
>> http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/37463
>
>My stock thinking is that because it follows the xUnit pattern that's
> most famili
Ovid wrote:
> PerlUnit is dead. Lots of people are recommending PerlUnit. What have I
> missed?
>
> http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/37463
My stock thinking is that because it follows the xUnit pattern that's most
familiar to most non-Perl programmers. It's the first thing they stumble on
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 05:13:38 Nicholas Clark wrote:
> So everyone gainfully employed because they know what they are doing is
> automatically disqualified?
Ah yes, the Wikipedia Fallacy of Collective Alethiology.
-- c
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Josh Heumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> PerlUnit is dead. Lots of people are recommending PerlUnit. What have I
>> missed?
>
> I can't answer your question directly, but in looking at the questions
> you link to, something strikes me as odd: there are at l
* Shawn Boyette ☠ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-16 13:30]:
> I wondered this myself. My guess is (1) they're dissociated
> from what I think of as "the Perl community" (which is why i
> tried to stress it in my post on stackoverflow) and (2) google
> for "perl unit testing".
Yes. There are lots and
* Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-16 13:25]:
> You need a +15 modifier of nothingbettertodoism to vote.
Thankfully, it is very, *very* easy to rack up those points:
getting one of your posts upvoted gives you 10 points. So it’s
just a minimal barrier so you can’t register a horde of smur
--- On Tue, 16/9/08, David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think they limit votes the way PM does
I only have 9 votes left today :)
Cheers,
Ovid
--
Buy the book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/
Tech blog- http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/
Twitter
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So everyone gainfully employed because they know what they are doing is
> automatically disqualified?
I don't think they limit votes the way PM does, and it only takes two
upvotes to get qualified to vote up, so we just n
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 04:23:16AM -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> # from Josh Heumann
> # on Tuesday 16 September 2008 02:37:
>
> >Shouldn't the people who post more-or-less agreeing solutions vote
> > each other's solution up?
>
> Yes. Now try to do it ;-)
>
> You need a +15 modifier of nothingb
I wondered this myself. My guess is (1) they're dissociated from what
I think of as "the Perl community" (which is why i tried to stress it
in my post on stackoverflow) and (2) google for "perl unit testing".
I agree that it's an unhappy state of affairs, but probably not an
uncommon one, and almo
# from Josh Heumann
# on Tuesday 16 September 2008 02:37:
>Shouldn't the people who post more-or-less agreeing solutions vote
> each other's solution up?
Yes. Now try to do it ;-)
You need a +15 modifier of nothingbettertodoism to vote.
--Eric
--
"Because understanding simplicity is complicat
> PerlUnit is dead. Lots of people are recommending PerlUnit. What have I
> missed?
I can't answer your question directly, but in looking at the questions
you link to, something strikes me as odd: there are at least six posts
by people recommending TAP-friendly solutions, and only two mention
17 matches
Mail list logo
