Re: Test::Simple's a bit overzealous...

2001-05-10 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:32:38PM -0400, barries wrote: > React to $^C begin set by not emitting anything? Oooh, very clever! Alas, this was added somewhere in 5.005 maintenance (change 3175). I've managed to shove the minimum version for Test::Simple back to 5.004 and I'll try to keep it ther

Re: Test::Simple's a bit overzealous...

2001-05-10 Thread barries
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 07:31:18PM +0100, Michael G Schwern wrote: > I'm running into alot of problems with this: > > use Test::Simple tests => 42; > > The problem is, Test::Simple expects you to specify the number of > tests when you load it and thus *at your script's compile time*. It

Re: Test::Simple's a bit overzealous...

2001-05-10 Thread Casey West
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 07:31:18PM +0100, Michael G Schwern wrote: : I'm running into alot of problems with this: : : use Test::Simple tests => 42; : : The problem is, Test::Simple expects you to specify the number of : tests when you load it and thus *at your script's compile time*. It

Test::Simple's a bit overzealous...

2001-05-10 Thread Michael G Schwern
I'm running into alot of problems with this: use Test::Simple tests => 42; The problem is, Test::Simple expects you to specify the number of tests when you load it and thus *at your script's compile time*. It also means that the '1..N' line is printed at compile time. This has the awfu