Re: add points for registered namespaces

2007-08-21 Thread demerphq
On 8/21/07, brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, demerphq > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 8/21/07, brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The effect of this kwalitee metric would be that fewer modules are > > > registered as I or Adam just stop pa

Re: add points for registered namespaces

2007-08-21 Thread brian d foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/21/07, brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The effect of this kwalitee metric would be that fewer modules are > > registered as I or Adam just stop paying attention because it's too > > much work now. > > Maybe you

Re: add points for registered namespaces

2007-08-21 Thread demerphq
On 8/21/07, brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Cyberiade . it Anonymous Remailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > there's a lot of questionable modules being uploaded to CPAN > > which create top-level namespaces, very often not even being > > self-explanat

Re: add points for registered namespaces

2007-08-20 Thread brian d foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > WRT the intent of forcing the user to get approval for their module: while > it's nice to ask for opinions for your module, it sucks to hold up sharing > your new module with the world while waiting for humans to resp

Re: add points for registered namespaces

2007-08-20 Thread brian d foy
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]] In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christopher H. Laco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do we even register namespaces any more? I tried 3 years ago with Handel > and never heard anything. We st

Re: add points for registered namespaces

2007-08-20 Thread brian d foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cyberiade . it Anonymous Remailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > there's a lot of questionable modules being uploaded to CPAN > which create top-level namespaces, very often not even being > self-explanatory. it would be nice to add points for > modules which have re

Re: add points for registered namespaces

2007-08-20 Thread Michael G Schwern
Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote: > there's a lot of questionable modules being uploaded to CPAN > which create top-level namespaces, very often not even being > self-explanatory. it would be nice to add points for > modules which have registered namespaces. this should encourage > more appro

Re: add points for registered namespaces

2007-08-20 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Christopher H. Laco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-20 14:50]: > Do we even register namespaces any more? I registered Sub::ArgShortcut just a few months ago. When I release a 1.0 of XML::Atom::SimpleFeed I’ll register that too. > If I'm wrong, then I'd like to register a few then, like Handel. G

Re: add points for registered namespaces

2007-08-20 Thread Christopher H. Laco
Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote: > there's a lot of questionable modules being uploaded to CPAN > which create top-level namespaces, very often not even being > self-explanatory. it would be nice to add points for > modules which have registered namespaces. this should encourage > more appro

add points for registered namespaces

2007-08-20 Thread Cyberiade . it Anonymous Remailer
there's a lot of questionable modules being uploaded to CPAN which create top-level namespaces, very often not even being self-explanatory. it would be nice to add points for modules which have registered namespaces. this should encourage more appropriate module naming.