On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 14:51:13 -0400, Ricardo SIGNES
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was going nuts recently, trying to figure out why I couldn't use
> is_deeply to compare objects. I've finally determined that it's only an
> issue (as far as I see) when comparing objects that overload
> dereferencin
I was going nuts recently, trying to figure out why I couldn't use
is_deeply to compare objects. I've finally determined that it's only an
issue (as far as I see) when comparing objects that overload
dereferencing to their implementation type.
The attached code should fail all three tests; at no
