On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Jim Cromie wrote:
> > What's notable in its absence is any *real* use of perl-dist's tests.
> > I dug into the code, and found that this works.
> >
> > $> HARNESS_TIMER=1 make test
> > ext/threads/t/end
Jim Cromie wrote:
> What's notable in its absence is any *real* use of perl-dist's tests.
> I dug into the code, and found that this works.
>
> $> HARNESS_TIMER=1 make test
> ext/threads/t/end.ok 60 ms
> ext/threads/t/err...
I was pondering a perl-core todo-item
=head2 A decent benchmark
C seems impervious to any recent changes made to the perl core. It
would be useful to have a reasonable general benchmarking suite that roughly
represented what current perl programs do, and measurably reported whether
tweaks to the
