On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:17:26PM -0700, Robert Spier wrote:
> > > I'd rather something that can actually live on bugs.perl.org.
> > How about a bugs.perl.org Kwiki?
>
> I have not yet drunk that particular Kool Aid.
I will unleash Ingy upon you when he gets back.
> I'm happy to accept patch
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:00:55PM -0700, Robert Spier wrote:
> > There doesn't seem to be any documentation anywhere on this, and we
> > thought the QA wiki might be a useful place to try putting it
> > together.
>
> I'd rather something that can actually live on bugs.perl.org.
How about a bugs.
> > I'd rather something that can actually live on bugs.perl.org.
> How about a bugs.perl.org Kwiki?
I have not yet drunk that particular Kool Aid.
I'm happy to accept patches. I also want to retain some level of
editorial control over it, to make sure we don't make right-turns.
-R
At Fri, 18 Jul 2003 18:19:19 +0100,
Tony Bowden wrote:
> I've been chatting with Casey about how we should best be dealing with
> the perlbug RT interface - e.g. what to do when you come across a bug
> that's resolved, what the various statuses mean etc.
The proper place for this particular discus
I've been chatting with Casey about how we should best be dealing with
the perlbug RT interface - e.g. what to do when you come across a bug
that's resolved, what the various statuses mean etc.
There doesn't seem to be any documentation anywhere on this, and we
thought the QA wiki might be a usef
