On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 12:42:57AM -0600, chromatic wrote:
> I've just added a really simple convenience function that skips the
> rest of the tests in a suite. It's different from the normal skip()
> in that it doesn't require nested named blocks.
I'm wary of putting this in. I'm afraid that a
On Wednesday 10 October 2001 12:46, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> I'm wary of putting this in. I'm afraid that a skip_rest() in a test
> wouldn't last long under continued additions to the test. It imposes
> a restriction that every test below that point must be effected by it,
> and anything you
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 09:47:08AM -0600, chromatic wrote:
> That's a good point. I see this as helpful in situations like the
> Term::Complete test, where there's a range of configurations where the test
> can't be run at all. If the test gets to that point, it's not worth even
> attempting
Here is an example of very slight side effect of using Test::More
in test suite, which I had trouble with today.
package Bareword::Freaks;
sub foobar {
require Carp;
Carp::croak 'blah';
}
1;
This will be a compile error:
String found where operator expected at - line
