O_ACCMODE

2002-03-31 Thread Mark-Jason Dominus
Supposing that Fcntl and O_RDONLY are known to be available, how likely is it that O_ACCMODE will also be available? Are there any platforms that have O_RDONLY but not O_ACCMODE?

Re: O_ACCMODE

2002-03-31 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Mon 01 Apr 2002 04:57, Mark-Jason Dominus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Supposing that Fcntl and O_RDONLY are known to be available, how > likely is it that O_ACCMODE will also be available? Are there any > platforms that have O_RDONLY but not O_ACCMODE? Cygwin has it: PC03:/usr/include 50