Hi!
CPANTS and Phalanx both care about Kwalitee. So I thought it might be a good
idea to come up with one more or less complete list of Kwalitee-hints that
both projects can use.
A lot of the hints listed at http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/kwalitee.html are
rather vague, which is OK for Phalanx, as it
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:28:29AM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> * contains files:
> * Makefile.PL or Build.PL or configure
configure?
> * README
Personally, I find READMEs useless duplication. Even more so now that
search.cpan.org works so well.
> * t/* or test.pl
test.pl is not a go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Monday 13 October 2003 11:57, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:28:29AM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > * contains files:
> > * Makefile.PL or Build.PL or configure
>
> configure?
>
> > * README
>
> Personally, I find READMEs u
Thomas Klausner wrote in perl.qa :
>
> Hints that were in Leon's last release, but which I didn't port up to now:
> * POD errors
> * POD/Code ratio (what would be a good measurement?)
use Pod::Coverage ?
> * testers results
> * number of releases
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 06:51:43PM +0200, Tels wrote:
> > > * t/* or test.pl
> >
> > test.pl is not a good thing. It doesn't get parsed by "make test". It
> > just runs and spits the output to the screen. If a test fails, "make test"
> > will still succeed. Still, its better than nothing at a
After much research, I've managed to reduce a Devel::Cover bug down to a one-liner
which only
fails on one box. This box is unique because it's ActiveState Perl for Linux (not my
choice!).
However, that might be a red herring. My 'perl -V' is below the test case. Does
anyone have a
similar s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Monday 13 October 2003 10:28, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Hi!
> * POD/Code ratio (what would be a good measurement?)
No. Some _very_ complex code takes little documentation like:
=head2 sub delete_first_n_entries($N)
Deletes the first N
FYI: I've managed to replicate this error on another ActiveState Perl linux box. The
Perl -V
information is the same, but the module list is quite a bit smaller. The only common
element that
I can find is ActiveState.
Cheers,
Ovid
=
Silence is Evilhttp://users.easystreet.com/
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 01:49:58PM -0700, Ovid wrote:
> After much research, I've managed to reduce a Devel::Cover bug down to
> a one-liner which only fails on one box. This box is unique because
> it's ActiveState Perl for Linux (not my choice!). However, that might
> be a red herring. My 'pe
--- Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the key is that it is perl version 5.6.1. I can reproduce the
> problem on a stock 5.6.1 on linux (well, hacked just enough to get it to
> build).
Hmmm ... I saw this *after* my second ActiveState email.
> Actually, I wonder whether 5.6.1 sho
10 matches
Mail list logo
