On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:32:28PM -0600, Michael Carman wrote:
> On 11/3/2003 12:20 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 05:33:09PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> Right now, if your cover_db holds data for a dozen files, but you test them
> >> one at a time, you have to rea
Michael Carman said:
> On 10/31/2003 8:08 AM, Andy Lester wrote:
>>
>> Personally, I find the POD useful when I'm going thru a Devel::Cover run.
>> I interleave POD with functions and I like to refer to my docs.
>
> Well, since POD is intended to be documentation (not code or even comments)
> it
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 05:06:01PM +0100, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
> At 14:06 + 11/3/03, Tim Bunce wrote:
> >Its cheap to reset an iterator, just do
> > keys %foo;
> >before the C loop.
>
> Just wondering, is keys() optimized for void context? Perlfunc only states:
>
>As a side eff
At 2003-11-03 21:35:22 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Just wondering, is keys() optimized for void context?
Yes. From doop.c:Perl_do_kv:
OP *
Perl_do_kv(pTHX)
{ ...
keys = hv;
(void)hv_iterinit(keys);/* always reset iterator regardless */
if (gim
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:18:34AM +0530, Abhijit Menon-Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 2003-11-03 21:35:22 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Just wondering, is keys() optimized for void context?
>
> Yes. From doop.c:Perl_do_kv:
>
> OP *
> Perl_do_kv(pTHX)
> { ...
>
>
