hi paul.
I've found that in a statement like
$x{foo} ||= 1;
I can't ever satisfy the first condition in the "condition coverage" matrix
(0,0) since 1 is always true. is it desirable to remove fixed truth values
like this from the truth table?
I tried taking a look at adding the condition t
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 04:34:39PM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> hi paul.
>
> I've found that in a statement like
>
> $x{foo} ||= 1;
>
> I can't ever satisfy the first condition in the "condition coverage" matrix
> (0,0) since 1 is always true. is it desirable to remove fixed truth values
> This is unlikely to be the only case in which I have not fully
> understood the subtleties of the op tree, and so I am grateful for
> reports such as this.
I'll keep them coming, then :)
>
> The following patch should fix it, and will be in the next release,
> hopefully coming next week:
exce
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 08:08:19PM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> well, I was trying to be a good citizen and provide a useful test case
> (rather than a tarball that merely exhibited the issue). I did add
And I appreciate it.
> something to cond_or and ran 'make test TEST_FILES=t/acond_or.t' b
