I actually just looked over the patch and it was actually for changing
'name' to 'comment', not 'description'.
I am actually going to agree with you, 'comment' does seem the best
fit. 'description' would be my second choice, and 'label' third.
- Steve
On Feb 5, 2005, at 3:23 PM, Ian Langworth w
Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
> http://astray.com/tmp/phalanx.html
This now mentions core modules and notices Mandrake contrib
(Module-Packaged 0.79 just hit CPAN), so Mandrake jumps from 28 -> 87.
Leon
--
Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.co
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 03:12:20PM -0500, Stevan Little wrote:
> I sent Schwern a patch to change 'names' to 'description', but then
> Andy brought up the idea of 'labels'. At the time, Schwern said it was
> 'in the pipeline', but I expect its actually been moved out since.
If its not in the RT
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 04:47:55PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
> > Let me second that one! Of course, Andy's already made it clear that
> > he doesn't have a lot of time, but I still don't mind kicking 'im. :)
>
> I think the right approach is to patch T::H::S to collect diagnostic
> information and
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 06:59:26PM -0500, Ian Langworth wrote:
> 'comment', however, seems just right -- it implies a short, optional
> description.
I like comment, too. It already has a meaning in Perl (and every other
language) and its just the same.
So as of right now, that's official.
On Feb 6, 2005, at 3:16 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 06:59:26PM -0500, Ian Langworth wrote:
'comment', however, seems just right -- it implies a short, optional
description.
I like comment, too. It already has a meaning in Perl (and every other
language) and its just the sa
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 15:08 -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Last I checked, IPC::Open3 has portability issues.
Right. My original patch made T::H::S use that, but I now prefer to put
that burden on the program that uses the module to make sure that
diagnostics come in correctly.
> There's als
On Feb 6, 2005, at 2:16 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 06:59:26PM -0500, Ian Langworth wrote:
'comment', however, seems just right -- it implies a short, optional
description.
I like comment, too. It already has a meaning in Perl (and every other
language) and its just the sa
Last I checked, IPC::Open3 has portability issues.
Right. My original patch made T::H::S use that, but I now prefer to
put
that burden on the program that uses the module to make sure that
diagnostics come in correctly.
I should NOT have applied that? It's already on my trunk.
xoa
--
Andy Lester
