[RFC] Test::Plan

2005-03-15 Thread Geoffrey Young
hi all :) following up on the discussion from a few months ago but renewed over the weekend, here is Test::Plan. basically all it does is carry over the exact syntax and helper functions we are already using in Apache-Test land to the greater community. I'm still working up additional tests, but

Re: Module popularity

2005-03-15 Thread Robert
cpanratings.perl.org? Ian Langworth wrote: Fair enough. On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 00:37:26 -0600, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd rather it didn't. What people think of as "popularity" is not what Phalanx measures. Let's not stir the mud.

Re: [RFC] Test::Plan

2005-03-15 Thread Ian Langworth
Rock! First, just a nitpicky thing -- You could simplify Makefile.PL to not need File::*: WriteMakefile( ... test => { TESTS => join ' ', map { glob } qw( t/*/*.t t/*/*/*.t ) }, ... ); Also, I agree that the use-Test-Plan-after-Test-More caveat is icky. How about modifying Test::Plan::impo

Re: [RFC] Test::Plan

2005-03-15 Thread Geoffrey Young
> test => { TESTS => join ' ', map { glob } qw( t/*/*.t t/*/*/*.t ) }, but slashes aren't portable, right? I don't think you can get rid of File::Spec. > Also, I agree that the use-Test-Plan-after-Test-More caveat is icky. well, it's a caveat, not a requirement :) the way it works now is t

Re: [RFC] Test::Plan

2005-03-15 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:33:25AM -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > test => { TESTS => join ' ', map { glob } qw( t/*/*.t t/*/*/*.t ) }, > > but slashes aren't portable, right? I don't think you can get rid of > File::Spec. In this case they should be portable. Windows will understand them

Re: Module popularity

2005-03-15 Thread Michael G Schwern
Greetings and OOK, Jarkko. Ian asked the musical question http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/3850 The CPAN Search FAQ at http://search.cpan.org/faq.html reads: Q: Do you keep statistics on which modules are most popular? A: Not right now. But there are plans to add some kind of p