Adam Kennedy writes:
> Christopher H. Laco wrote:
>
> > Tony Bowden wrote:
> >
> > > What's the difference to you between me shipping a a .t file that
> > > uses Pod::Coverage, or by having an internal system that uses
> > > Devel::Cover in a mode that makes sure I have 100% coverage on
> > > ev
Adam Kennedy writes:
> Michael Graham wrote:
>
> > Another good reason to ship all of your development tests with code
> > is that it makes it easer for users to submit patches with tests.
> > Or to fork your code and retain all your development tools and
> > methods.
>
> Perl::MinimumVersion, w
chromatic writes:
> On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 20:59 -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
>
> > And the more the better!
>
> Well sure. Two-space indent is clearly better than one-space indent,
> and four-space is at least twice as good as that.
Negative quality for anybody who includes a literal tab characte
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 08:24:01AM +, Smylers wrote:
> Negative quality for anybody who includes a literal tab character
> anywhere in the distro's source!
Negative quality for anyone whose files appear to have been edited in
emacs!
Tony
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 12:17:17AM +, Smylers wrote:
> Remember that we aren't measuring quality, but kwalitee. Kwalitee is
> supposed to provide a reasonable indication of quality, so far as that's
> possible. So what matters in determining whether a kwalitee heuristic
> is appropriate is wh
Tony Bowden wrote:
so even if a neural net (or whatever) did come up
with the above substring heuristic, once it's know then authors can game
the system by artificially crowbarring into their modules' sources, at
which point the heuristic loses value.
I thought the idea was that we /wanted/ people
> "Tony" == Tony Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tony> Negative quality for anyone whose files appear to have been edited in
Tony> emacs!
Now, them's fightin' words!
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Un
On Apr 16, 2005, at 2:53 PM, Adam Kennedy wrote:
JSPANTS, you mean? I think we need a CJSPAN, first. Alias?
Yes well... I'm getting there slowly.
JavaScript::Librarian + Algorithm::Dependency + YAML ought to be
enough to get some basics sorted out...
Well, you should know that there are a now a nu
On Apr 16, 2005, at 3:00 PM, Adam Kennedy wrote:
It's going to totally depend on what you want to wrap around it...
Do you want the human interacty mode? Or the machine county mode.
"machine county mode"? Just that, I think.
Forget the document object for a moment, you are more accurately in
the e
Michael G Schwern wrote:
tie() always returns an object.
The object returned by the "new" method is also
returned by the "tie" function, which would be useful if you
want to access other methods in CLASSNAME.
Your insight's and Kevin's were incorporate
> Well, you should know that there are a now a number of people I know of
> who are working on JSAN-y things in parallel. I've Cc'd them on this
> message. Maybe we should set up a mail list somewhere an coordinate our
> efforts? What would be the proper venue for that?
I'm betting there is n
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 05:23:56PM -0400, jesse wrote:
> I'm betting there is no javascript community organization we can
> leverage.
Perhaps the DynAPI folks might be interested.
http://dynapi.sourceforge.net/dynapi/
And then there's the whole Ajax thing which I'm not really up on enough
to dete
On Apr 17, 2005, at 3:12 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Perhaps the DynAPI folks might be interested.
http://dynapi.sourceforge.net/dynapi/
Perhaps, But then the mail lists are simply hosted by SourceForge. Ick.
And then there's the whole Ajax thing which I'm not really up on enough
to detect if ther
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 04:26:32PM -0700, David Wheeler wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2005, at 3:12 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> >Perhaps the DynAPI folks might be interested.
> >http://dynapi.sourceforge.net/dynapi/
>
> Perhaps, But then the mail lists are simply hosted by SourceForge. Ick.
Sorry, the p
14 matches
Mail list logo
