In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brett Sanger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > Test::Builder docs, in case I was going to have to roll my own
> > > prove-like tool, and didn't see an obvious call there either.
> >
> > Test::Manifest is the way to get them in a certain order.
>
> Ah, thanks. Is
It's not unheard of for module authors to complain that the automated
test reports posted on testers.cpan.org FAIL modules that ought to PASS.
Tonight, I wish to make the opposite complaint: that one of my own
modules garnered four PASSes when it should have FAILed!
Je m'accuse: Two days ag
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 10:49:12PM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
> The inference I drew was that the four false positives I received for
> v0.35 came from automated testing in an environment where IO::Capture
> was already installed, so that the test script did not need to find
> IO::Capture in t
