Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The real issue is that, if Shlomi had come to me and discussed the
> issues rather than "I want to fork Test::Harness", we could have worked
> together. Instead, it's "I want color-coding of tests, and T::H doesn't
> do what I want, so I'm gonna go fork it
Andy Lester wrote in perl.qa :
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:52:49PM -0700, chromatic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> > I do NOT want to see that sort of thing as patches to Test::Harness.
>
>> I have a few ideas myself on how to make T::H a little more clean and
>> useful, but I'd have to do some ref
-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>That said, now that TAP is well documented (yay), there's nothing wrong
>with writing other harnesses.
Just as a comment, I used the TAP doco to write a VB console app for
testing the non-GUI (library) part of a V
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 08:33:48 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just as a comment, I used the TAP doco to write a VB console app for
> testing the non-GUI (library) part of a VB application I recently became
> responsible for. The console app writes TAP to STDOUT, and this can be
> picked up by
