On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 09:09:00 -0500, Michael Peters wrote:
> It's very similar in nature to the Pugs smoke test server, but is completely
> project agnostic. It's also completely self contained (contains local copies
> all
> of it's Perl modules and a local apache/mod_perl). It's released in bi
After some trouble, I managed to create a distribution tarball for my
patched Redhat 8 system from smolder-0.01-src using bin/
smolder_makedist.
The problem I encountered was in
src/libapreq-1.3.tar.gz - specifically in
src/libapreq-1.3/Makefile.PL (after unpacking the tarball)
the code
I encountered a real-world case where Test::More's use_ok() passed
when the specified package had a fatal syntax error. I'm looking for
advice about whether I should file a bug, or fix my code that
triggered the false positive. Read on for details...
Consider two packages Foo.pm and Bar.p
On Mar 5, 2006, at 13:52, Chris Dolan wrote:
Advice? While this example is contrived, the "eval
{ require ... }" idiom is used often in the wild, so this is not a
wholly unrealistic scenario.
Of course it should be
eval { require Bar; 1; } or die $@;
But I agree that it seems like if t
On Mar 5, 2006, at 3:55 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
On Mar 5, 2006, at 13:52, Chris Dolan wrote:
Advice? While this example is contrived, the "eval
{ require ... }" idiom is used often in the wild, so this is not a
wholly unrealistic scenario.
Of course it should be
eval { require Bar; 1
Yuval Kogman wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 09:09:00 -0500, Michael Peters wrote:
>> It's very similar in nature to the Pugs smoke test server, but is completely
>> project agnostic. It's also completely self contained (contains local copies
>> all
>> of it's Perl modules and a local apache/mo
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 17:55:03 -0500, Michael Peters wrote:
> It's already resulted in Test::TAP::XML. Nothing immediately jumps out as
> applicable outside of smolder, but I'm sure more will come up. I've also got
> some planned improvements to Test::Harness::Straps and Test::TAP::Model that
>
Matisse Enzer wrote:
> After some trouble, I managed to create a distribution tarball for my
> patched Redhat 8 system from smolder-0.01-src using bin/smolder_makedist.
Thanks for trying this out so soon. It's been developed on FC3, but I can't
imagine adding RH8 support will be too hard but it'
On Mar 5, 2006, at 3:15 PM, Michael Peters wrote:
Matisse Enzer wrote:
After some trouble, I managed to create a distribution tarball for my
patched Redhat 8 system from smolder-0.01-src using bin/
smolder_makedist.
Thanks for trying this out so soon. It's been developed on FC3,
...
W
