Re: Proposed kwalitee metric: installer_not_executable

2006-03-18 Thread Tels
Moin, On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:12, Adam Kennedy wrote: > From my understanding, one of the little idiosyncrasies of > Makefile.PL/Build.PL installers (including MI variants of both) is that > in order to make sure that the Makefile and Build use the correct perl > installation, you should alw

Re: What is the Value of t/0-signature.t?

2006-03-18 Thread Tels
Moin, On Saturday 18 March 2006 03:39, Adam Kennedy wrote: > Audrey Tang wrote: > > On 3/17/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Do you mean that it's valuable only for the author to run (perhaps > >> during disttest) and rarely useful for the user to run during > >> installation? > > > >

Re: Proposed kwalitee metric: installer_not_executable

2006-03-18 Thread Tels
On Saturday 18 March 2006 09:36, Tels wrote: > Moin, > > On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:12, Adam Kennedy wrote: > > From my understanding, one of the little idiosyncrasies of > > Makefile.PL/Build.PL installers (including MI variants of both) is > > that in order to make sure that the Makefile and B

Re: Proposed kwalitee metric: installer_not_executable

2006-03-18 Thread demerphq
On 3/18/06, Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Moin, > > On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:12, Adam Kennedy wrote: > > From my understanding, one of the little idiosyncrasies of > > Makefile.PL/Build.PL installers (including MI variants of both) is that > > in order to make sure that the Makefile and Bu

Re: Proposed kwalitee metric: installer_not_executable

2006-03-18 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 11:31:05 +0100, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/18/06, Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Moin, > > > > On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:12, Adam Kennedy wrote: > > > From my understanding, one of the little idiosyncrasies of > > > Makefile.PL/Build.PL installers (incl