Geoffrey Young wrote:
Since you're using C++, you can probably use libtap
(http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2006/01/19/libtap.html and
http://jc.ngo.org.uk/trac-bin/trac.cgi/wiki/LibTap) for writing the tests and
then you could use a Perl harnes to collect those results.
just out of curiosity
Nik Clayton wrote:
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>>> Since you're using C++, you can probably use libtap
>>> (http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2006/01/19/libtap.html and
>>> http://jc.ngo.org.uk/trac-bin/trac.cgi/wiki/LibTap) for writing the
>>> tests and
>>> then you could use a Perl harnes to coll
Hi Andrew
I know it's somewhat vapour at the moment, and I'm keeping somewhat
quiet, but the new post-Audrey'fied PITA design is aiming at exactly
what you have described.
Initial deployment targets include a pugs smoker, parrot smoker, and
CPAN Testers 2.
Of course, I have no idea how you
Sorry for the lack of information, but PITA's design is fairly
ambitious, and until the core testing loop is completed, absolutely
every other part of it would block waiting for me to finish.
So I've kept things mostly under wraps. With the core almost done (we've
had to scrap a major componen
--- Adam Kennedy wrote:
> I know it's somewhat vapour at the moment, and I'm keeping somewhat
> quiet, but the new post-Audrey'fied PITA design is aiming at exactly
> what you have described.
Thanks for the reminder about PITA. I'd (unforgivably) forgotten about
that project when I first enquire
* Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-09 18:35]:
> Sorry for the lack of information, but PITA's design is fairly
> ambitious,
Hmm, I just saw this:
http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2006/04/our-conference-on-automated-testing.html
The submission deadline has already passed, but I figure
