Hi!
I finally managed to set up a (working...) cronjob that analyses the
new dists uploaded in the last 24 hours. You can expect new data each
day around 02:45 EDT.
--
#!/usr/bin/perl http://domm.zsi.at
for(ref bless{},just'another'perl'hacker){s-:+-$"-g&&print$_.
Great!
I would also like to see e-mail sent out the the author when her
module is analysed.
Similarry to CPAN testers this should only go out in 'bad' cases to some
arbitrary definition of 'bad'
e.g:
1) a metric turned from good to bad since the last analysis
2) overall rate of the module is unde
Can someone tell me why this test fails?
#!/usr/bin/perl -l
use strict;
use warnings;
use Test::More 'no_plan';
use Test::Differences;
use Data::Dumper;
my @data = qw(foo bar);
ok my $data = pack('u', @data), 'packing data should succeed';
ok my @new_data = un
On 9/28/06, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can someone tell me why this test fails?
your pack template is one item long. try C<'u*'> instead.
~jerry
From: jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> your pack template is one item long. try C<'u*'> instead.
Still fails.
use Test::More 'no_plan';
use Test::Differences;
my @data = qw(foo bar);
ok my $data = pack('u*', @data), 'packing data should succeed';
ok my @new_data = unpack('u*'
[re-send for the mailing list]
Subject: Time to pack
From: Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
}ok my $data = pack('u', @data), 'packing data should succeed';
perldoc -f pack:
* Each letter may optionally be followed by a number giv-
On 27 Sep 2006, at 23:53, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
[snip]
Would it be possible, or even desirable to flip some sort of config to
make this test all t files, or tell this policy that my test class eq
'Test::More' in this instance?
[snip]
Not that this wouldn't be a nice idea, but as another a
> Override Test::Builder::ok to croak if it doesn't get a test name argument.
> Package that up in a module and shim it in with PERL5OPT or
> HARNESS_PERL_SWITCHES.
I kind of dislike this approach. If my tests are failing, I want them
to fail because my program is broken, not because my tests
On 28 Sep 2006, at 22:37, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
Override Test::Builder::ok to croak if it doesn't get a test name
argument. Package that up in a module and shim it in with PERL5OPT
or HARNESS_PERL_SWITCHES.
I kind of dislike this approach. If my tests are failing, I want them
to fail bec
> If you have access to other platforms, please see what your "make" program
> returns on failure and let me know.
debian% make
perl -e "die"
Died at -e line 1.
make: *** [all] Fehler 255
It's a Debian Etch with German locale.
Running "LANG=C make" has the same result.
debian% LANG=en make
p
Subject: Time to pack
From: Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
}ok my $data = pack('u', @data), 'packing data should succeed';
perldoc -f pack:
* Each letter may optionally be followed by a number giv-
ing a repeat
On 9/28/06, Uwe Voelker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
debian% make
perl -e "die"
Died at -e line 1.
make: *** [all] Fehler 255
It's a Debian Etch with German locale.
Of course. Locales. It all seemed too easy.
Time for plan B.
David
12 matches
Mail list logo
