Suggestions for cpantesters

2006-09-30 Thread Alexandr Ciornii
Hello! For a long time I'm using Test::Reporter. Now I participate in Vanilla Perl project (http://win32.perl.org). I've started CPAN smoke. I've come to several ideas regarding cpantesters. I want your opinion on them. 1. YAML files on http://cpantesters.perl.org/ should include compiler

Re: TAP 2.0

2006-09-30 Thread Jonathan Rockway
I like the "YAML" syntax, but can we live with: got: | this is line 1 this is line 2 expected: | this is line 1 this is line 2 Instead? That way a real YAML parser can parse the output of TAP, which could be important for adoption by other languages. Rather than require others to write a TA

Re: TAP 2.0

2006-09-30 Thread Andy Lester
On Sep 30, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Jonathan Rockway wrote: I like the "YAML" syntax, but can we live with: got: | this is line 1 this is line 2 expected: | I really don't like "got". "got" and "expected" are not parallel parts of speech. I'd prefer "actual". -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: TAP 2.0

2006-09-30 Thread jason gessner
or 'received' instead of 'got'. Andy pointing out tap's use of 'got' makes me think prove should end like: 1/9 tests ain't right. Test no good. damn. :) -jason On Oct 1, 2006, at 12:18 AM, Andy Lester wrote: On Sep 30, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Jonathan Rockway wrote: I like the "YAML" synta