In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris
Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 3, 2006, at 3:58 PM, brian d foy wrote:
>
> > Even better would be something like Pod::Spellchecker. I've started
> > the
> > project several times but never had that much motivation to finish it.
> > Things would b
In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ivan
Tubert-Brohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> brian d foy wrote:
> "Even better would be something like Pod::Spellchecker. I've started the
> project several times but never had that much motivation to finish it.
> Things would be simple if it could just spell-c
Recently I was required to create another flavor of test harness that
runs tests, then captures and stores output.
The nature of my testing means that I am running millions of tests,
and the resultant captured output is therefore huge. So I modified
my tests to do the *equivalent* of the f
On 5 Oct 2006, at 15:11, Paul Beckingham wrote:
Recently I was required to create another flavor of test harness
that runs tests, then captures and stores output.
The nature of my testing means that I am running millions of tests,
and the resultant captured output is therefore huge. So I
On 10/3/06, Ivan Tubert-Brohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/3/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I read a lot of documentation for CPAN modules and find a fair few typos. Yet
> making patches for the POD is a hassle; I would have to download the archive,
> uncompress it, copy the fi
On Oct 4, 2006, at 13:18, brian d foy wrote:
I tried those a long time ago. I wanted something interactive that
doesn't rely on external programs.
It should probably use Text::Aspell under the hood, if it can.
Best,
David
On Oct 4, 2006, at 3:16 PM, brian d foy wrote:
Not really. :) The spell checking is done by external programs, and
the
Pod::Spell module outputs something that doesn't have all of the
original docs in it. You can find out if there are spelling errors,
but
you don't get back something that fix
I'm having a idiot moment...
I'm trying to mock out some config reading tests for reading from
MP1/MP2 even though I don't have either installed. so I thought
"Test::MockObjext is the answer!".
The following code goes boom with a 'Can't locate object method request
via package "Apache"':
> use s
On Thursday 05 October 2006 12:25, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
> I'm having a idiot moment...
>
> I'm trying to mock out some config reading tests for reading from
> MP1/MP2 even though I don't have either installed. so I thought
> "Test::MockObjext is the answer!".
>
> The following code goes boom
chromatic wrote:
> On Thursday 05 October 2006 12:25, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
>
>> I'm having a idiot moment...
>>
>> I'm trying to mock out some config reading tests for reading from
>> MP1/MP2 even though I don't have either installed. so I thought
>> "Test::MockObjext is the answer!".
>>
>>
chromatic wrote:
> On Thursday 05 October 2006 12:25, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
>
>> I'm having a idiot moment...
>>
>> I'm trying to mock out some config reading tests for reading from
>> MP1/MP2 even though I don't have either installed. so I thought
>> "Test::MockObjext is the answer!".
>>
>>
On Thursday 05 October 2006 12:48, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
> I won't pretend not be be confused at the moment then, because I have
> other tests that do:
>
> T::MO->new->fake_module('Foo'), and classes that 'use Foo' and do
> 'Foo->new' just work with the mocked verson. At least, I thought they
12 matches
Mail list logo
