[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm very pleased to announce that tidyview is now available from CPAN.
Neat idea, but this is bad:
0 windhund /usr/local/src/CPAN/tidyview-1.09$ sudo make install
Password:
Installing /usr/local/lib/site_perl/VERSION.pm
Like it or not, we have to live with case-insensi
I am on a fact finding mission.
Can Perl be used to update a value in the Windows Registry? If so,
does anyone have sample code that does this?
Dennis Hancy
Eaton Corporation
Cleveland, OH
See Win32::TieRegistry
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Win32-TieRegistry
Regards,
David Golden
On 17 Oct 2006 07:33:16 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am on a fact finding mission.
Can Perl be used to update a value in the Windows Registry? If so,
does anyone have sample co
On Oct 17, 2006, at 9:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am on a fact finding mission.
Can Perl be used to update a value in the Windows Registry? If so,
does anyone have sample code that does this?
Go to search.cpan.org and search for "Registry".
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.
Thanks everyone!
Win32::TieRegistry works great. Appreciate the help :)
Dennis
Andy Lester wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2006, at 9:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I am on a fact finding mission.
> >
> > Can Perl be used to update a value in the Windows Registry? If so,
> > does anyone have sam
Thanx for that, I'll get onto it ASAP.
And your absolutely right, I should have lowered the VERSION.pm into a safer
namespace.
Leif
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 October 2006 5:05 PM
To: Leif Eriksen
Cc: perl-qa@perl.org
Subject:
Thanx, I'll update.
This was a hangover from an earlier prototype, where we actually made calls to
perltidy itself, rather than the more flexible Perl::Tidy API. As such we
didn’t detect a missing perltidy install until runtime. The current code makes
no use of the perltidy program, only the AP
Randy J. Ray wrote:
> While checking the Wiki page recently pointed to, I noticed that several of
> the entries under "Producers" are actually parsers.
Umm, which ones? I guess Test.Simple has a parser.
Its a Wiki. You don't announce that there's something wrong, you just fix it.
On Oct 17, 2006, at 16:37, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Umm, which ones? I guess Test.Simple has a parser.
No, Test.Simple does no parsing. It reads a data structure. So you
should probably call it an emitter.
Best,
David
