Hi,
On Friday 12 January 2007 01:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You don’t have to use objects to get the same end effects as mocking
> objects.
Right!
Now, as my "devil's advocate" signature tried to show, this thread is for the
fun of the discussion. I'm sure all of use, and Ovid more than th
Hi all!
In this message to Israel.PM:
http://perl.org.il/pipermail/perl/2006-September/008165.html
Yuval Kogman claimed that Module::Build generates CPAN testers reports with no
output from the test harness. Now, I released Math::GrahamFunction, which is
based on Module::Build, a few days ago
On 1/12/07, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yuval Kogman claimed that Module::Build generates CPAN testers reports with no
output from the test harness. Now, I released Math::GrahamFunction, which is
based on Module::Build, a few days ago and today received this failure error
report:
http
Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi all!
Hello Shlomi,
Yuval Kogman claimed that Module::Build generates CPAN testers
reports with no
output from the test harness. Now, I released Math::GrahamFunction,
which is
based on Module::Build, a few days ago and today received this
failure error
report:
htt
As I've been increasing the test coverage of XML::RSS, something has occured
to me. Let's suppose we have the following pseaudo-code:
<<
sub func1
{
my ($self, @params) = @_;
.
.
.
if (COND)
{
$self->do_something(...);
}
--- Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is naturally a limitation of test coverage in general which only
> checks
> coverage for individual code atoms, and not for all the different
> paths of
> execution (their Cartesian products).
Regrettably, the while code coverage is generally fa
chromatic wrote:
> (I know; it's not exactly what you were asking. I just wanted to get that in
> a public mailing list so I could call that the "Star Trek: Generations"
> fallacy. You steal a spaceship, which flies through space, to fly through
> space to a planet, flying through space, where
* Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-13 00:25]:
> I know of one gentleman who described his problem of having a
> Chain of Responsibility pattern where every step of the chain,
> properties stored in a database could alter the outcome. There
> were, at last count, 50,000 properties in the database.
