Hi Tony,
* Edwardson, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-14 08:55]:
> And are willing to let us improve coverage ?
>
> **
> This is a commercial communication from Commerzbank AG.
>
> [20 lines snipped]
>
>
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 09:09:12AM +0100, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> * Edwardson, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-14 08:55]:
> > This is a commercial communication from Commerzbank AG.
> >
> > [20 lines snipped]
> is there any chance you could subscribe this list using an
> address wh
I've just uploaded CPAN::FindDependencies version 2 to the CPAN. This
is pretty much a complete re-write which has lots of cool new Stuff:
* uses Parse::CPAN::Packages instead of CPAN.pm, so loads faster and
takes a lot less memory;
* much better core module detection;
* user can specify which
Adrian Howard wrote:
>
> On 11 Dec 2007, at 05:12, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
>> Adam Kennedy posed me a stumper on #toolchain tonight. In short,
>> having a
>> test which checks your signature doesn't appear to be an actual
>> deterrent to
>> tampering. The man-in-the-middle can just delete th
Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:12:51 -0800, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL
>> PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Adam Kennedy posed me a stumper on #toolchain tonight. In short, having a
> > test which checks your signature doesn't appear to be an actual deterrent
> to
> > tam
Edwardson, Tony wrote:
> Anyone written any CPAN modules for which the testing coverage needs to be
> improved ?
>
> Want someone else to sort this out for you ?
...
> Any takers ?
http://search.cpan.org/dist/ExtUtils-MakeMaker
Repository here:
http://svn.schwern.org/svn/CPAN/ExtUtils-MakeMake
* Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-10T11:52:33]
> On 10 Dec 2007, at 16:49, Ovid wrote:
> >Seems Ricardo Signes likes this idea, too:
> >
> > http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/35076
>
>
> Who? :)
:'(
I like this idea so much that if you point me at a repo and failing tests, I
will tr
