--- Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, what, in your example, are the keys you want to
> standardize/reserve for tap specific purposes? IMHO all keys (file,
> line, results, have, want, name, display) are specific to
> Test::Differences. You probably don't want to standardize them,
On Apr 7, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Sun, April 6, 2008 9:28 pm, Gabor Szabo wrote:
Is there a W3C validator that works locally on my computer?
All the modules I found so far use the http://validator.w3.org/
service
including Test::HTML::W3C but that's not really usa
I made a presentation to Madison.pm (Madmongers.org) on software
testing in general and Perl testing in particular. It was intended
to be introductory since many Madmongers are casual Perl users and
most do not have the testing religion. After discussing reasons for
and types of testing,
On Apr 13, 2008, at 15:58, chromatic wrote:
The problem with an infinitely expandable protocol that tries to do
everything
is that it's infinitely expandable and tries to do everything.
Might be nice
to rein that in a little bit more. Or don't, and instead make it
trivial to
add ad-hoc ke
On 17 Apr 2008, at 06:48, Chris Dolan wrote:
[snip]
Interesting reactions:
* People were appalled that Test::Class invokes methods in
alphabetic order instead of lexical order
If it's any comfort so is the author :-) At some point I'll be
changing T::C to follow lexical-order-by-class met
