When I run tests for a distribution, say CHI, I'd like to be able to
ignore any installed versions of CHI's modules. That way I know I'm
testing it as if it were a fresh install.
In the latest version I deleted a necessary module, CHI/t/
Multilevel.pm, from the distribution, but "make test"
Is there and FTP server module that could be used for light-weight
testing of an application that among other things also fetches a file from
and ftp server ?
I should be able to set it up simply without root access and run it
on a high port allowing access based on some username/password
not rela
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Jonathan Swartz wrote:
> One solution, I guess, is to use a fresh install of Perl that contains just
> the requirements for CHI. But I'd need one of these for each CPAN
> distribution I'm working on!
You only need one fresh perl. Set CPAN not to install build_requ
On 09/05/06 12:57 +0300, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> Is there and FTP server module that could be used for light-weight
> testing of an application that among other things also fetches a file from
> and ftp server ?
>
> I should be able to set it up simply without root access and run it
> on a high port
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> Is there and FTP server module that could be used for light-weight
> testing of an application that among other things also fetches a file from
> and ftp server ?
>
> I should be able to set it up simply without root access and run it
> on a hi
Jonathan Swartz wrote:
In the latest version I deleted a necessary module, CHI/t/Multilevel.pm,
from the distribution, but "make test" still succeeded because
CHI/t/Multilevel.pm was installed in /usr/local.
You could also put your testing libs in t/lib instead of CHI/t that way they are
nev
That's true, but this isn't just about testing libs - it's any lib I might
delete from the distribution.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Peters
Date: Wednesday, May 6, 2009 6:22 am
Subject: Re: masking installed versions when running tests
To: Jonathan Swartz
CC: perl-qa
Jonathan Swar
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 08:44:00AM -0700, Jonathan Swartz wrote:
> From: Michael Peters
> > Jonathan Swartz wrote:
> > > In the latest version I deleted a necessary module, CHI/t/Multilevel.pm,
> > > from the distribution, but "make test" still succeeded because
> > > CHI/t/Multilevel.pm was ins
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:05 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
>> That's true, but this isn't just about testing libs - it's any lib I
>> might delete from the distribution.
>
> You want Devel::Hide.
I think the original question was about catching a module deleted by
mistake -- otherwise, Devel::Hide ro
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:15:38PM -0400, David Golden wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:05 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
> >> That's true, but this isn't just about testing libs - it's any lib I
> >> might delete from the distribution.
> > You want Devel::Hide.
> I think the original question was ab
Gabor Szabo wrote:
> So I think - besides the fact that M::I probably should not load the
> required modules to memory
That was fixed in MakeMaker 6.51_01 at Adam Kennedy's request. So it'll
trickle down to Module::Install.
--
'All anyone gets in a mirror is themselves,' she said. 'But what yo
11 matches
Mail list logo
