* Ricardo Signes [2010-01-03 14:35]:
> It would be a shocking display of benevolence on the part of
> O'Reilly to "give up" the camel. And... "live dangerously?"
> Do you mean: "piss off the publisher of many useful Perl books,
> opening ourselves to lawsuits and ostracism?"
>
> That's not a good
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> It’s unrecognisable at favicon size. The camel is distinctive
> down to a handful of pixels. And if you add a shell to it, so can
> a pearl be. In fact a pearl in a shell is what iX magazine in
> Germany has used as the masthead for the
