Re: What CPANTS needs

2000-08-23 Thread Andrew Wilson
On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 11:44:39PM -0500, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote: > Michael G Schwern [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth: > *>Here's what CPANTS needs to get moving that I can't handle myself... > *> > *>A mailing list. [EMAIL PROTECTED] or something. Ask? > > Ask already did that as I recall. H

Re: [PATCH] Test::More isa_ok function

2001-09-28 Thread Andrew Wilson
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:40:15PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 06:23:58PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote: > > The patch below allows you to supply your own test name for the isa_ok > > function (I find the default insufficiently descriptive). I'd like to do > > the same fo

Re: A new lease on life for Perl Refactoring

2001-09-16 Thread Andrew Wilson
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:45:50AM +0200, Michael G Schwern wrote: > That's it. And the refactoring browser just helps you with the > mechanics of that. > > THAT'S SO EASY! If it works for them, it can work for us. > > > So, I can handle the underlying mechanics no problem. Who's good at > G

Re: Test::More and 'deep' tests

2003-09-09 Thread Andrew Wilson
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 05:49:47PM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote: > On Tuesday 09 September 2003 15:29, Tony Bowden wrote: > > my $str1 = MyString->new("foo", "bar"); > > my $str2 = MyOtherString->new("foo", "baz"); > > Now they _do_ differ by more than just class and it should be a fail, although > I

Re: Uncle Bob on Coding Standards

2004-12-13 Thread Andrew Wilson
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 02:15:45PM +, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 12:21:50PM +, Matt Sergeant wrote: >> On 14 Dec 2004, at 11:26, Clayton, Nik wrote: >>> That's something the editor can care about. When I hit the TAB key it >>> should just do whatever the house style