Idea for extending 'no_plan'

2006-08-07 Thread Daniel Risse
Hello everyone, I have come up with an alternative to specifying the number of tests while still verifying that they all execute properly. It is my understanding that the main benefit to taking the time to specify a plan is to verify nothing funky happened before all the tests were executed

Re: Idea for extending 'no_plan'

2006-08-07 Thread Daniel Risse
is_ok); ## terminated_ok(); So accidentally, some of the tests were not executed. With the two END block idea, wouldn't they both execute still in this case? - Dan A. Pagaltzis wrote: * Daniel Risse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-08 05:10]: So something like this: use Test::Simpl

Re: DIAGNOSTICS section

2006-12-19 Thread Daniel Risse
Nadim Khemir wrote: I believe it would be better to put the diagnostics in the methods generating them. Better yet, why would we we give a short error message when a longer, more complete message would be more appropriate? or maybe confess/carp should take a short and a long message and disply