Leo Lapworth wrote:
> Maybe someone could get a grant to hire someone/a company with design skills
> to come up with a better logo than the onion?
I always thought that something to do with pearls would be nice. Kinda
like this
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/47/La_nascita_di_Vene
Ricardo Signes wrote:
> The problems with pearls include: (a) promoting mispeling Perl as Pearl and
> (b)
> a pearl reduces, in its simplest depiction, to a circle. It's not very
> visually distinctive.
They're pronounced the same way. Perl as a pearl is a pun, a play on
words. (Of course, som
Ovid wrote:
> What is our concern vis-a-vis the camel and how can we approach O'Reilly
> regarding this concern?
http://oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/perl/usage/
Note the part about permissi...@oreilly.com
--
Just my 0.0002 million dollars worth,
Shawn
Programming is as much about organiza
Ovid wrote:
> And let's face it: to many people, onions stink and they *do* make you cry.
> That's not a positive association.
>
> Perl: the language that will make you cry.
Shrek: Ogres arePerls is like onions.
Donkey: They stink?
Shrek: Yes. No.
Donkey: Oh, they make you cry.
Shrek: No.
Don
