Re: Looking for tool like pydoc to document perl cgi scripts

In article , Jeff Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there an application for perl cgi scripts that will generate formatted > HTML documentation similar to what I can get with pydoc? > http://web.lfw.org/python/pydoc.html you can put POD in your CGI scripts,

Re: how to run test.pl before the t/*.t tests ?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So first I thought to try to run test.pl before the t/-tests. Hence the > subject. How to do this is still interesting, though maybe not necessary: You used to be able to set the order of tests through MakeMaker, then that f

Re: WWW::Mechanize and ASP.NET

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 03:35:38PM -0400, Potozniak, Andrew > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Has anyone encountered some really odd errors, namely status 500 errors when > > surfing to ASP.Net files only through means of WWW:

Re: Probing requirements (was: Re: Some ideas)

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Randy W. Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Probe::OS - Gather info on the operating system > Probe::Libs > Probe::Progs > Probe::FileSys - maybe incorporate ideas Schwern posted on p5p recently, Perhaps we can put this under a namespace like Config:: ? I imagi

Re: Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: fixing is_deeply]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/1/05, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > After talking with Ovid some in the kitchen I'm of the opinion that > > is_deeply() is currently doing the right thing and that these tests cannot > > go. Largely it c

Re: Basic Testing Questions

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brett Sanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > Test::Builder docs, in case I was going to have to roll my own > > > prove-like tool, and didn't see an obvious call there either. > > > > Test::Manifest is the way to get them in a certain order. > > Ah, thanks. Is

Re: False Positives from Automated Testing at testers.cpan.org

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 10:49:12PM -0400, James E Keenan wrote: > > The inference I drew was that the four false positives I received for > > v0.35 came from automated testing in an environment where IO::Capture > > w

Re: First (developers) Release of Test::Shlomif::Harness

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:52:49PM -0700, chromatic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > I do NOT want to see that sort of thing as patches to Test::Harness. > > I have a few ideas myself on how to make T::H a little more clean